Details
Newsletter Information
Newsletter: IBC Laws Today—Commercial & Dispute Resolution
Edition date: 16 October 2026
Publisher: IBC Laws
Primary coverage: Arbitration, commercial litigation, insolvency, company law, RERA, SARFAESI, PMLA and the Negotiable Instruments Act
Forums covered: Supreme Court, High Courts, NCLAT, NCLT, Real Estate Appellate Tribunal and Debt Recovery Tribunal
Arbitration Law
Case: Sunfield Global Pte Ltd. v. Liberty Investments Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Bombay High Court
Section 9 petition: The Court held that a petition seeking interim protection before the constitution of an arbitral tribunal may remain maintainable.
Foreign-seated arbitration: The petition may be entertained when the remedy available before the foreign-seated tribunal has not been shown to be efficacious.
Interim protection: Delay attributable to court proceedings cannot be permitted to defeat interim relief concerning an admitted monetary claim.
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 5624 HC
Commercial Courts
Case: Intellect Design Arena Ltd. v. Mindgate Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Madras High Court
Expert evidence: Recording the evidence of a court-appointed expert before issues have been framed does not constitute commencement of the trial.
Summary judgment: Such evidence does not prevent a party from applying for summary judgment under Order XIII-A of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 5718 HC
Proof of Default under Section 7 of the IBC
Decision: Supreme Court Sets Evidentiary Hierarchy for IBC Section 7 Default Proof
CIRP admission: The Supreme Court upheld the commencement of corporate insolvency resolution proceedings against two hotel companies.
Information Utility record: An authenticated record from an Information Utility can independently establish the occurrence of default.
Debt quantum: A disagreement concerning the final amount of debt need not delay the admission of an otherwise valid Section 7 application.
Practical significance: The ruling clarifies the relative evidentiary value of records used to establish financial default.
Oppression, Mismanagement and Share Buyout
Decision: NCLAT Sets Aside Share Buyout Order Without Section 241 Findings
Legal requirement: A direction for the purchase of shares under Section 242(2)(b) requires prior findings of oppression and mismanagement.
Order set aside: NCLAT found that the necessary findings under Section 241 had not been recorded before the share-purchase direction was issued.
Remand: The matter was returned for fresh valuation and reconsideration.
Maharashtra RERA Proceedings
Decision: Maharashtra REAT Rejects Full Forfeiture of Flat Booking Consideration
Amount involved: The allottee had paid ₹4.27 lakh before execution of an agreement for sale.
Nature of payment: The Tribunal found that the amount constituted part payment of the purchase consideration rather than earnest money.
Appeal outcome: The promoter’s appeal seeking complete forfeiture of the payment was dismissed.
MSMED Statutory Arbitration
Decision: Bombay High Court Rejects Section 11 Plea After MSMED Statutory Arbitration Begins
Appointment request: The Court declined to appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11.
Statutory proceeding: Arbitration had already commenced before the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council under Section 18(3) of the MSMED Act.
Parallel proceedings: Contractual arbitration cannot operate simultaneously with MSEFC arbitration concerning the same dispute.
SARFAESI Proceedings
Decision: DRT Chennai Upholds SARFAESI Section 14 Order, Grants Time Until 31 October
Tribunal: Debt Recovery Tribunal, Chennai
Section 14 order: The Tribunal found no patent illegality in the possession order issued by the court at Belagavi.
Temporary protection: Execution of the order was restrained until 31 October 2026.
Purpose of relief: The additional time was granted to enable the borrowers to arrange finance.
PMLA Bail and Article 21
Decision: Supreme Court Grants PMLA Bail, Says Section 45 Cannot Override Article 21
Accused: Sanjay Sureka
Period in custody: More than 20 months
Reason for bail: The Court considered the improbability of the trial being completed in the near future.
Constitutional protection: The statutory conditions under Section 45 of the PMLA cannot displace the right to personal liberty under Article 21.
Forwarding delay: The challenge concerning a five-day delay under Section 19(2) of the PMLA was rejected.
Group and Cross-Border Insolvency
Research paper: Group Insolvency and Cross-Border Challenges: Evaluating India’s Draft Part ZA Framework against International Standards
Author: Adv. Nishi Yadav
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 154 Art.
Framework examined: Draft Part ZA proposed by the Cross-Border Insolvency Rules and Regulations Committee in December 2021
Research focus: The paper evaluates the proposed voluntary and flexible group-insolvency mechanism against international standards.
EPFO Claims after CIRP
Article: Dealing with EPFO Claims after Initiation of the CIRP
Author: Adv. Shivpartap Singh Thakur
Citation: (2026) ibclaw.in 147 Art.
Post-moratorium assessments: The article examines the legal consequences of EPFO assessments made after commencement of the insolvency moratorium.
Section 14: It considers how the IBC moratorium applies to proceedings conducted under provident-fund legislation.
Claim treatment: The discussion distinguishes crystallised and uncrystallised claims and examines their treatment within the resolution process.
Liquidation Records
Decision: NCLT Indore Directs Former RP and Directors to Furnish Liquidation Records
Application outcome: The liquidator’s application was partly allowed.
Records required: The former resolution professional and suspended directors were directed to supply the records available to them.
Missing documents: Any unavailable records must be explained through affidavits.
Additional disclosure: The respondents must provide information concerning lease proceedings and related deposits.
Negotiable Instruments Act
Decision: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Section 138 Acquittal over Proprietorship Proof
Appellant: Sanjay Pant
Named payee: Sanjay Traders
Evidentiary failure: No evidence was produced establishing that the appellant was the proprietor of the concern named as payee on the cheque.
Appeal outcome: The challenge to the acquittal was dismissed.
Development Agreement Arbitration
Decision: Bombay High Court Refers Later Development Agreement Disputes to Arbitration
Arbitrator appointment: The Court appointed a sole arbitrator to consider the disputes.
Later breaches: Disputes arising from subsequent breaches of the same development agreement may be referred to arbitration.
Limitation: A fresh notice cannot revive claims that have already become barred by limitation.
Additional Access
Daily digest: The newsletter also provides access to the IBC Laws Today daily case-law updates dated 15 October 2026.
Coverage: The daily digest includes important developments in insolvency, corporate, banking, RERA and arbitration law.
Mobile application: Readers may access judgments, case-law updates and research materials through the IBC Laws application.
Further information: Complete judgments, articles and detailed case analyses are available through the links included in the original IBC Laws newsletter.